You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Building a community of practice through social media using the hashtag #neoEBM
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0252472 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amy Keir, Nicolas Bamat, Bron Hennebry, Brian King, Ravi Patel, Clyde Wright, Alexandra Scrivens, Omar ElKhateeb, Souvik Mitra, Damian Roland |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 28% |
| Australia | 3 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Kyrgyzstan | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 17 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 65% |
| Scientists | 7 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,479,892
of 24,366,830 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#18,723
of 210,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,932
of 437,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#363
of 2,876 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,366,830 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 210,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,876 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.