↓ Skip to main content

Implementing Dementia Care Mapping to develop person‐centred care: results of a process evaluation within the Leben‐QD II trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Nursing, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementing Dementia Care Mapping to develop person‐centred care: results of a process evaluation within the Leben‐QD II trial
Published in
Journal of Clinical Nursing, December 2016
DOI 10.1111/jocn.13522
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tina Quasdorf, Christine Riesner, Martin Nikolaus Dichter, Olga Dortmann, Sabine Bartholomeyczik, Margareta Halek

Abstract

To evaluate Dementia Care Mapping (DCM) implementation in nursing homes. DCM, an internationally applied method for supporting and enhancing person-centred care (PCC) for people with dementia, must be successfully implemented into care practice for its effective use. Various factors influence the implementation of complex interventions such as DCM; few studies have examined specific factors influencing DCM implementation. A convergent parallel mixed methods design embedded in a quasi-experimental trial was used to assess DCM implementation success and influential factors. From 2011 to 2013, nine nursing units in nine different nursing homes implemented either DCM (n=6) or a periodic quality of life measurement using the dementia-specific instrument QUALIDEM (n=3). Diverse data (interviews, n=27; questionnaires, n=112; resident records, n=81; and process documents) were collected. Each data set was separately analysed and then merged to comprehensively portray the implementation process. Four nursing units implemented the particular intervention without deviating from the pre-planned intervention. Translating DCM results into practice was challenging. Necessary organisational preconditions for DCM implementation included well-functioning networks, a dementia-friendly culture, and flexible organisational structures. Involved individuals' positive attitudes towards DCM also facilitated implementation. Precisely planning the intervention and its implementation, recruiting champions who supported DCM implementation, and having well-qualified, experienced project coordinators were essential to the implementation process. For successful DCM implementation, it must be embedded in a systematic implementation strategy considering the specific setting. Organisational preconditions may need to be developed before DCM implementation. Necessary steps may include team building, developing and realising a PCC-based mission statement, or educating staff regarding general dementia care. The implementation strategy may include attracting and involving individuals on different hierarchical levels in DCM implementation and supporting staff to translate DCM results into practice. The identified facilitating factors can guide DCM implementation strategy development. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 121 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 21%
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 27 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 29 24%
Psychology 17 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 14%
Social Sciences 15 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 32 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2016.
All research outputs
#3,415,750
of 24,641,327 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#894
of 5,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,358
of 429,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#21
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,641,327 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.