↓ Skip to main content

Is Military Deployment a Risk Factor for Maternal Depression?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Women's Health (15409996), October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is Military Deployment a Risk Factor for Maternal Depression?
Published in
Journal of Women's Health (15409996), October 2012
DOI 10.1089/jwh.2012.3606
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stacie Nguyen, Cynthia A. LeardMann, Besa Smith, Ava Marie S. Conlin, Donald J. Slymen, Tomoko I. Hooper, Margaret A.K. Ryan, for the Millennium Cohort Study Team Tyler C. Smith

Abstract

Maternal depression is a common condition among new mothers that can be associated with poor maternal health and negative consequences on infant health. Little research has been conducted to examine maternal depression, especially among military mothers, where unique conditions often exist. Using data from a large military cohort, this study prospectively examined the relationship between deployment experience before and after childbirth and maternal depression among U.S. service women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 82 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Master 13 15%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 21 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 13%
Social Sciences 10 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 25 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2013.
All research outputs
#1,473,776
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Women's Health (15409996)
#407
of 2,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,233
of 191,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Women's Health (15409996)
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.