↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Is Military Deployment a Risk Factor for Maternal Depression?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Women's Health (15409996), January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary News Blogs Twitter Facebook Google+ Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is Military Deployment a Risk Factor for Maternal Depression?
Published in
Journal of Women's Health (15409996), January 2013
DOI 10.1089/jwh.2012.3606
Pubmed ID
23051068
Authors

Stacie Nguyen, Cynthia A. LeardMann, Besa Smith, Ava Marie S. Conlin, Donald J. Slymen, Tomoko I. Hooper, Margaret A.K. Ryan, Tyler C. Smith, for the Millennium Cohort St

Abstract

Maternal depression is a common condition among new mothers that can be associated with poor maternal health and negative consequences on infant health. Little research has been conducted to examine maternal depression, especially among military mothers, where unique conditions often exist. Using data from a large military cohort, this study prospectively examined the relationship between deployment experience before and after childbirth and maternal depression among U.S. service women.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 72 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 27%
Social Sciences 10 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 17 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2013.
All research outputs
#1,244,335
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Women's Health (15409996)
#349
of 2,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,777
of 280,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Women's Health (15409996)
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.