You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.mr000030.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucy Turner, Larissa Shamseer, Douglas G Altman, Laura Weeks, Jodi Peters, Thilo Kober, Sofia Dias, Kenneth F Schulz, Amy C Plint, David Moher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 31% |
| United States | 4 | 15% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 42% |
| Scientists | 6 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 447 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 432 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 65 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 63 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 27 | 6% |
| Other | 112 | 25% |
| Unknown | 86 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 171 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 7% |
| Psychology | 27 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 66 | 15% |
| Unknown | 119 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,036,462
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,060
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,856
of 195,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.