You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Summary of recommendations and key points of the consensus of Spanish scientific societies (SEPAR, SEMICYUC, SEMES; SECIP, SENEO, SEDAR, SENP) on the use of non-invasive ventilation and high-flow oxygen therapy with nasal cannulas in adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients with severe acute respiratory failure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medicina Intensiva (English Edition), May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.medine.2021.04.002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Luján, Ó. Peñuelas, C. Cinesi Gómez, A. García-Salido, J. Moreno Hernando, A. Romero Berrocal, I. Gutiérrez Ibarluzea, J.F. Masa Jiménez, A. Mas, J.M. Carratalá Perales, M. Gaboli, A. Concheiro Guisán, J. García Fernández, J. Escámez, J. Parrilla Parrilla, E. Farrero Muñoz, M. González, S.B. Heili-Frades, M.Á. Sánchez Quiroga, G. Rialp Cervera, G. Hernández, A. Sánchez Torres, R. Uña, C.F. Ortolà, M. Ferrer Monreal, C. Egea Santaolalla |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 23% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Researcher | 3 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 65% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2021.
All research outputs
#16,734,944
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Medicina Intensiva (English Edition)
#284
of 528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,017
of 453,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medicina Intensiva (English Edition)
#17
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.