| Title |
A global analysis of the impact of COVID-19 stay-at-home restrictions on crime
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Human Behaviour, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41562-021-01139-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amy E. Nivette, Renee Zahnow, Raul Aguilar, Andri Ahven, Shai Amram, Barak Ariel, María José Arosemena Burbano, Roberta Astolfi, Dirk Baier, Hyung-Min Bark, Joris E. H. Beijers, Marcelo Bergman, Gregory Breetzke, I. Alberto Concha-Eastman, Sophie Curtis-Ham, Ryan Davenport, Carlos Díaz, Diego Fleitas, Manne Gerell, Kwang-Ho Jang, Juha Kääriäinen, Tapio Lappi-Seppälä, Woon-Sik Lim, Rosa Loureiro Revilla, Lorraine Mazerolle, Gorazd Meško, Noemí Pereda, Maria F. T. Peres, Rubén Poblete-Cazenave, Simon Rose, Robert Svensson, Nico Trajtenberg, Tanja van der Lippe, Joran Veldkamp, Carlos J. Vilalta Perdomo, Manuel P. Eisner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 481 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Uruguay | 103 | 21% |
| United States | 30 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 26 | 5% |
| Spain | 17 | 4% |
| Japan | 9 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 6 | 1% |
| Canada | 6 | 1% |
| Australia | 5 | 1% |
| Sweden | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 50 | 10% |
| Unknown | 225 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 390 | 81% |
| Scientists | 67 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 197 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 12% |
| Researcher | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 90 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 28 | 14% |
| Psychology | 11 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 5% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 38 | 19% |
| Unknown | 96 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 915. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#19,148
of 25,813,008 outputs
Outputs from Nature Human Behaviour
#53
of 1,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#769
of 462,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Human Behaviour
#1
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,813,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 160.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.