↓ Skip to main content

Risk Categories in COVID-19 Based on Degrees of Inflammation: Data on More Than 17,000 Patients from the Spanish SEMI-COVID-19 Registry

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Medicine, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk Categories in COVID-19 Based on Degrees of Inflammation: Data on More Than 17,000 Patients from the Spanish SEMI-COVID-19 Registry
Published in
Journal of Clinical Medicine, May 2021
DOI 10.3390/jcm10102214
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuel Rubio-Rivas, Xavier Corbella, Francesc Formiga, Estela Menéndez Fernández, María Martín Escalante, Isolina Baños Fernández, Francisco Arnalich Fernández, Esther Del Corral-Beamonte, Antonio Lalueza, Alejandro Parra Virto, Emilia Roy Vallejo, José Loureiro-Amigo, Ana Álvarez Suárez, Jesica Abadía-Otero, María Navarro De La Chica, Raquel Estévez González, Almudena Hernández Milián, María Areses Manrique, Julio Blázquez Encinar, Amara González Noya, Ruth González Ferrer, María Pérez Aguilera, Ricardo Gil Sánchez, Jesús Millán Núñez-Cortés, José Casas-Rojo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Librarian 5 9%
Other 5 9%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 18 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 41%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 19 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2021.
All research outputs
#839,430
of 21,174,193 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Medicine
#260
of 9,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,956
of 347,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Medicine
#4
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,174,193 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.