↓ Skip to main content

The Evolutionary Characteristics of Apple Production Layout in China from 1978 to 2016

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência Rural, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Evolutionary Characteristics of Apple Production Layout in China from 1978 to 2016
Published in
Ciência Rural, January 2021
DOI 10.1590/0103-8478cr20200688
Authors

Qiangqiang Zhang, Feilong Weng, Fanji Shi, Liqun Shao, Xuexi Huo

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2021.
All research outputs
#22,774,430
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#1,058
of 2,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#448,987
of 519,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#109
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.