↓ Skip to main content

Mobilising knowledge in complex health systems: a call to action

Overview of attention for article published in Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 362)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
107 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mobilising knowledge in complex health systems: a call to action
Published in
Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, August 2017
DOI 10.1332/174426416x14712553750311
Authors

Bev J Holmes, Allan Best, Huw Davies, David Hunter, Michael P Kelly, Martin Marshall, Joanne Rycroft-Malone

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 107 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 169 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 20%
Other 18 10%
Student > Master 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 24 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 54 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 13%
Psychology 7 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 30 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2020.
All research outputs
#268,416
of 16,276,344 outputs
Outputs from Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice
#7
of 362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,764
of 267,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,276,344 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them