↓ Skip to main content

Improving species status assessments under the U.S. Endangered Species Act and implications for multispecies conservation challenges worldwide

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Biology, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
29 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving species status assessments under the U.S. Endangered Species Act and implications for multispecies conservation challenges worldwide
Published in
Conservation Biology, June 2021
DOI 10.1111/cobi.13777
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reed F. Noss, Jennifer M. Cartwright, Dwayne Estes, Theo Witsell, Gregg Elliott, Daniel Adams, Matthew Albrecht, Ryan Boyles, Patrick Comer, Chris Doffitt, Don Faber‐Langendoen, JoVonn Hill, William C. Hunter, Wesley M. Knapp, Michael E. Marshall, Jason Singhurst, Christopher Tracey, Jeffrey Walck, Alan Weakley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 16 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 18 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 24%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Mathematics 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 18 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,227,999
of 25,318,210 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#704
of 4,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,036
of 435,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#16
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,318,210 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.