You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chinese herbal medicine for subfertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007535.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kunyan Zhou, Jing Zhang, Liangzhi Xu, Chi Eung Danforn Lim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 172 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
| Researcher | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 77 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 23% |
| Unspecified | 20 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 77 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2022.
All research outputs
#5,234,059
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,479
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,394
of 461,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#116
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.