| Title |
Estimating effective infection fatality rates during the course of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-021-11127-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christian Staerk, Tobias Wistuba, Andreas Mayr |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 282 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 32 | 11% |
| United States | 17 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 9 | 3% |
| Austria | 8 | 3% |
| Canada | 8 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 1% |
| Turkey | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 15 | 5% |
| Unknown | 171 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 254 | 90% |
| Scientists | 12 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 24% |
| Unknown | 15 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 20% |
| Unknown | 17 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 452. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#62,639
of 25,813,008 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#61
of 17,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,054
of 461,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#3
of 473 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,813,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 473 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.