You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Change in brain size during and after pregnancy: study in healthy women and women with preeclampsia.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Neuroradiology, January 2002
|
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Graeme M. Bydder, Oatridge, Angela, Holdcroft, Anita, Saeed, Nadeem, Hajnal, Joseph V, Puri, Basant K, Fusi, Luca, Bydder, Graeme M, Angela Oatridge, Anita Holdcroft, Nadeem Saeed, Joseph V. Hajnal, Basant K. Puri, Luca Fusi |
| Abstract |
Qualitative decreases in maternal brain size have been observed late in pregnancy. The aim of this study was to quantitatively evaluate changes to the maternal brain during and after healthy pregnancy and to compare these changes with those observed in cases of preeclampsia. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 10% |
| Australia | 6 | 8% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Kenya | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 37 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 57 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 7% |
| Scientists | 4 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 178 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 40 | 22% |
| Unknown | 29 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 21% |
| Psychology | 38 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 29 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 48 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 469. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2023.
All research outputs
#53,754
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#3
of 5,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32
of 127,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.