↓ Skip to main content

Geographical access to care at birth in Ghana: a barrier to safe motherhood

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
416 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Geographical access to care at birth in Ghana: a barrier to safe motherhood
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-991
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter W Gething, Fiifi Amoako Johnson, Faustina Frempong-Ainguah, Philomena Nyarko, Angela Baschieri, Patrick Aboagye, Jane Falkingham, Zoe Matthews, Peter M Atkinson

Abstract

Appropriate facility-based care at birth is a key determinant of safe motherhood but geographical access remains poor in many high burden regions. Despite its importance, geographical access is rarely audited systematically, preventing integration in national-level maternal health system assessment and planning. In this study, we develop a uniquely detailed set of spatially-linked data and a calibrated geospatial model to undertake a national-scale audit of geographical access to maternity care at birth in Ghana, a high-burden country typical of many in sub-Saharan Africa.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 416 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 407 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 105 25%
Researcher 56 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 8%
Student > Bachelor 33 8%
Lecturer 24 6%
Other 74 18%
Unknown 91 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 82 20%
Social Sciences 57 14%
Environmental Science 13 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 2%
Other 59 14%
Unknown 101 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,308,455
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,022
of 17,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,473
of 180,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#68
of 299 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 299 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.