You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Measurement and Interpretation of the Ankle-Brachial Index
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1161/cir.0b013e318276fbcb |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Victor Aboyans, Michael H Criqui, Pierre Abraham, Matthew A Allison, Mark A Creager, Curt Diehm, F Gerry R Fowkes, William R Hiatt, Björn Jönsson, Philippe Lacroix, Benôit Marin, Mary M McDermott, Lars Norgren, Reena L Pande, Pierre-Marie Preux, H E Jelle Stoffers, Diane Treat-Jacobson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 17% |
| Spain | 3 | 10% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 7% |
| Greece | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 10% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 969 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 950 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 116 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 111 | 11% |
| Researcher | 105 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 88 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 8% |
| Other | 239 | 25% |
| Unknown | 235 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 454 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 94 | 10% |
| Engineering | 27 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 2% |
| Other | 77 | 8% |
| Unknown | 273 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2021.
All research outputs
#797,288
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#2,044
of 21,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,130
of 182,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#15
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.