You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Experimental warming differentially affects vegetative and reproductive phenology of tundra plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-021-23841-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Courtney G. Collins, Sarah C. Elmendorf, Robert D. Hollister, Greg H. R. Henry, Karin Clark, Anne D. Bjorkman, Isla H. Myers-Smith, Janet S. Prevéy, Isabel W. Ashton, Jakob J. Assmann, Juha M. Alatalo, Michele Carbognani, Chelsea Chisholm, Elisabeth J. Cooper, Chiara Forrester, Ingibjörg Svala Jónsdóttir, Kari Klanderud, Christopher W. Kopp, Carolyn Livensperger, Marguerite Mauritz, Jeremy L. May, Ulf Molau, Steven F. Oberbauer, Emily Ogburn, Zoe A. Panchen, Alessandro Petraglia, Eric Post, Christian Rixen, Heidi Rodenhizer, Edward A. G. Schuur, Philipp Semenchuk, Jane G. Smith, Heidi Steltzer, Ørjan Totland, Marilyn D. Walker, Jeffrey M. Welker, Katharine N. Suding |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 29% |
| Sweden | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Guinea | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 18 | 47% |
| Members of the public | 18 | 47% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 137 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 15% |
| Researcher | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 48 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 36 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 55 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,234,587
of 25,843,331 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#19,107
of 58,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,629
of 461,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#759
of 1,999 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,843,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,683 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,999 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.