↓ Skip to main content

How is Telemedicine perceived? A qualitative study of perspectives from the UK and India

Overview of attention for article published in Globalization and Health, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How is Telemedicine perceived? A qualitative study of perspectives from the UK and India
Published in
Globalization and Health, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1744-8603-7-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melisa Martínez Álvarez, Rupa Chanda, Richard D Smith

Abstract

Improvements in communication and information technologies have allowed for the globalisation of health services, especially the provision of health services from other countries, such as the use of telemedicine. This has led countries to evaluate their position on whether and to what extent they should open their health systems to trade. This often takes place from the context of multi-lateral trade agreements (under the auspices of the World Trade Organisation), which is misplaced as a significant amount of trade takes place regionally or bi-laterally. We report here the results of a qualitative study assessing stakeholders' views on the potential for a bi-lateral trade relationship between India and the UK, where India acts as an exporter and the UK as an importer of telemedicine services.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 73 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 25%
Social Sciences 12 16%
Computer Science 6 8%
Engineering 5 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 15 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2014.
All research outputs
#14,155,634
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#916
of 1,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,830
of 111,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,099 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.