You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
The Needs of Women Treated for Ovarian Cancer: Results From a #gyncsm Twitter Chat
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews, April 2018
Teresa Hagan Thomas, Karin Nauth-Shelley, Michael A Thompson, Deanna J Attai, Matthew S Katz, David Graham, Dee Sparacio, Christina Lizaso, Audun Utengen, Don S Dizon
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||3||75%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||6||26%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||3||13%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||2||9%|
|Student > Master||2||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||4||17%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||2||9%|
|Arts and Humanities||1||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2021.
All research outputs
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
of 83 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 327,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them