↓ Skip to main content

A system for rapid exploration of shader optimization choices

Overview of attention for article published in ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A system for rapid exploration of shader optimization choices
Published in
ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2016
DOI 10.1145/2897824.2925923
Authors

Yong He, Tim Foley, Kayvon Fatahalian

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 4%
Austria 1 4%
Unknown 23 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 20%
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 19 76%
Engineering 2 8%
Unknown 4 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2021.
All research outputs
#5,629,780
of 17,415,680 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#819
of 2,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,345
of 271,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#35
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,415,680 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.