↓ Skip to main content

A system for rapid exploration of shader optimization choices

Overview of attention for article published in ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A system for rapid exploration of shader optimization choices
Published in
ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2016
DOI 10.1145/2897824.2925923
Authors

Yong He, Tim Foley, Kayvon Fatahalian

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 5%
Austria 1 5%
Unknown 19 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 15 71%
Engineering 2 10%
Unknown 4 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,735,083
of 15,184,505 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#707
of 1,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,317
of 265,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#24
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,184,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.