↓ Skip to main content

Combination of toothbrushing and chlorhexidine compared with exclusive use of chlorhexidine to reduce the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combination of toothbrushing and chlorhexidine compared with exclusive use of chlorhexidine to reduce the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia: A systematic review with meta-analysis
Published in
Clinics, January 2021
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2659
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pedro Urquiza Jayme Silva, Luiz Renato Paranhos, Daniela Meneses-Santos, Cauane Blumenberg, Dhiancarlo Rocha Macedo, Sérgio Vitorino Cardoso

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 5 7%
Unspecified 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 31 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 26%
Unspecified 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 34 49%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2021.
All research outputs
#4,163,379
of 21,369,958 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#151
of 958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,646
of 293,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,369,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them