↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Oral antibiotics for chronic blepharitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Twitter Wikipedia Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oral antibiotics for chronic blepharitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013697.pub2
Pubmed ID
34107053
Authors

Neil Onghanseng, Sueko M Ng, Muhammad Sohail Halim, Quan Dong Nguyen

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 18%
Other 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Professor 2 3%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 24 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 30%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 27 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,250,911
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,959
of 12,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,883
of 447,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#107
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is provided by Altmetric.