↓ Skip to main content

Oral antibiotics for chronic blepharitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oral antibiotics for chronic blepharitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013697.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neil Onghanseng, Sueko M Ng, Muhammad Sohail Halim, Quan Dong Nguyen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 15%
Other 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 40 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 31%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 46 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,127,798
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,620
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,225
of 459,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#110
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.