↓ Skip to main content

Occupational and leisure time physical activity in contrasting relation to ambulatory blood pressure

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
linkedin
1 LinkedIn user

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Occupational and leisure time physical activity in contrasting relation to ambulatory blood pressure
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Els Clays, Dirk De Bacquer, Koen Van Herck, Guy De Backer, France Kittel, Andreas Holtermann

Abstract

While moderate and vigorous leisure time physical activities are well documented to decrease the risk for cardiovascular disease, several studies have demonstrated an increased risk for cardiovascular disease in workers with high occupational activity. Research on the underlying causes to the contrasting effects of occupational and leisure time physical activity on cardiovascular health is lacking. The aim of this study was to examine the relation of objective and self-report measures of occupational and leisure time physical activity with 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure (BP).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 98 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 25 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 23%
Sports and Recreations 12 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Psychology 9 9%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 32 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2012.
All research outputs
#2,581,389
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,944
of 14,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,876
of 275,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#45
of 288 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 288 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.