↓ Skip to main content

Standardizing nomenclature in regional anesthesia: an ASRA-ESRA Delphi consensus study of abdominal wall, paraspinal, and chest wall blocks

Overview of attention for article published in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 2,305)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
163 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Standardizing nomenclature in regional anesthesia: an ASRA-ESRA Delphi consensus study of abdominal wall, paraspinal, and chest wall blocks
Published in
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, June 2021
DOI 10.1136/rapm-2020-102451
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kariem El-Boghdadly, Morné Wolmarans, Angela D Stengel, Eric Albrecht, Ki Jinn Chin, Hesham Elsharkawy, Sandra Kopp, Edward R Mariano, Jeff L Xu, Sanjib Adhikary, Başak Altıparmak, Michael J Barrington, Sébastien Bloc, Rafael Blanco, Karen Boretsky, Jens Børglum, Margaretha Breebaart, David Burckett-St Laurent, Xavier Capdevila, Brendan Carvalho, Alwin Chuan, Steve Coppens, Ioana Costache, Mette Dam, Christian Egeler, Mario Fajardo, Jeff Gadsden, Philippe Emmanuel Gautier, Stuart Alan Grant, Admir Hadzic, Peter Hebbard, Nadia Hernandez, Rosemary Hogg, Margaret Holtz, Rebecca L Johnson, Manoj Kumar Karmakar, Paul Kessler, Kwesi Kwofie, Clara Lobo, Danielle Ludwin, Alan MacFarlane, John McDonnell, Graeme McLeod, Peter Merjavy, EML Moran, Brian D O'Donnell, Teresa Parras, Amit Pawa, Anahi Perlas, Maria Fernanda Rojas Gomez, Xavier Sala-Blanch, Andrea Saporito, Sanjay Kumar Sinha, Ellen M Soffin, Athmaja Thottungal, Ban C H Tsui, Serkan Tulgar, Lloyd Turbitt, Vishal Uppal, Geert J van Geffen, Thomas Volk, Nabil M Elkassabany

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 163 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 20%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 16 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Unspecified 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 19 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2022.
All research outputs
#324,216
of 22,598,357 outputs
Outputs from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#23
of 2,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,638
of 350,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#2
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,598,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.