You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
RCC1-like domain and ORF15: essentials in RPGR gene.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 5 |
Book title |
Retinal Degenerative Diseases
|
Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2006
|
DOI | 10.1007/0-387-32442-9_5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-0-387-28464-4, 978-0-387-32442-5
|
Authors |
Zi-Bing Jin, Mutsuko Hayakawa, Akira Murakami, Nobuhisa Nao-i, Jin, Zi-Bing, Hayakawa, Mutsuko, Murakami, Akira, Nao-i, Nobuhisa |
Editors |
Joe G. Hollyfield, Robert E. Anderson, Matthew M. LaVail |
Abstract |
Clinical research into mutations of the RPGR gene showed that lack of either the RCC1-like domain of the ORF15 causes X-linked retinitis pigmentosa. Thus, the ORF15 and RCC1-like domain play a crucial role in the human retina. Further sudies on the role of the RCC1-like domain in the visual Cascade and additional findings of related proteins in the retina or even other organs, will give us a more precise understanding of this protein. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 2 | 22% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 22% |
Researcher | 2 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 44% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 22% |
Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2014.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,226
of 4,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,087
of 154,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#12
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.