You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Photoreceptor retinol dehydrogenases. An attempt to characterize the function of Rdh11.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 70 |
Book title |
Retinal Degenerative Diseases
|
Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2006
|
DOI | 10.1007/0-387-32442-9_70 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-0-387-28464-4, 978-0-387-32442-5
|
Authors |
Anne Kasus-Jacobi, David G. Birch, Robert E. Anderson |
Editors |
Joe G. Hollyfield, Robert E. Anderson, Matthew M. LaVail |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2007.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,226
of 4,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,087
of 154,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#12
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.