You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Long COVID in a prospective cohort of home-isolated patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41591-021-01433-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bjørn Blomberg, Kristin Greve-Isdahl Mohn, Karl Albert Brokstad, Fan Zhou, Dagrun Waag Linchausen, Bent-Are Hansen, Sarah Lartey, Therese Bredholt Onyango, Kanika Kuwelker, Marianne Sævik, Hauke Bartsch, Camilla Tøndel, Bård Reiakvam Kittang, Anders Madsen, Geir Bredholt, Juha Vahokoski, Elisabeth Berg Fjelltveit, Amit Bansal, Mai Chi Trieu, Sonja Ljostveit, Jan Stefan Olofsson, Nina Ertesvåg, Helene Heitmann Sandnes, Anette Corydon, Hanne Søyland, Marianne Eidsheim, Kjerstin Jakobsen, Nina Guldseth, Synnøve Hauge, Rebecca Jane Cox, Nina Langeland |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12,295 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1728 | 14% |
| United States | 692 | 6% |
| Germany | 517 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 341 | 3% |
| Canada | 152 | 1% |
| Spain | 145 | 1% |
| Austria | 127 | 1% |
| France | 122 | <1% |
| Australia | 98 | <1% |
| Other | 1044 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7329 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11368 | 92% |
| Scientists | 491 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 302 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 120 | <1% |
| Unknown | 14 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 563 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 563 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 67 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 9% |
| Other | 35 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 6% |
| Other | 101 | 18% |
| Unknown | 230 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 123 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 20 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 3% |
| Other | 98 | 17% |
| Unknown | 257 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6725. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2023.
All research outputs
#449
of 24,520,187 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#13
of 8,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31
of 433,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#2
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,187 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 104.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.