↓ Skip to main content

Logic modeling and the ridiculome under the rug

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
30 X users
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Logic modeling and the ridiculome under the rug
Published in
BMC Biology, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1741-7007-10-92
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael L Blinov, Ion I Moraru

Abstract

Logic-derived modeling has been used to map biological networks and to study arbitrary functional interactions, and fine-grained kinetic modeling can accurately predict the detailed behavior of well-characterized molecular systems; at present, however, neither approach comes close to unraveling the full complexity of a cell. The current data revolution offers significant promises and challenges to both approaches - and could bring them together as it has spurred the development of new methods and tools that may help to bridge the many gaps between data, models, and mechanistic understanding.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 6%
United Kingdom 3 3%
Portugal 2 2%
Spain 2 2%
Singapore 1 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 76 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 11%
Other 8 8%
Professor 6 6%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 9 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 15%
Computer Science 5 5%
Engineering 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 13 14%