You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Core Outcome Set for Seamless, Standardized Evaluation of Innovative Surgical Procedures and Devices (COHESIVE)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgery, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1097/sla.0000000000004975 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kerry N.L. Avery, Nicholas Wilson, Rhiannon Macefield, Angus McNair, Christin Hoffmann, Jane M. Blazeby, Shelley Potter |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 24 | 63% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 53% |
| Scientists | 9 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2022.
All research outputs
#789,425
of 24,383,935 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#435
of 8,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,206
of 449,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#5
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,383,935 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.