You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Disperse and preserve the perverse: computing how hip-hop censorship changed popular music genres in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Poetics, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.poetic.2021.101590 |
| Authors |
Ke Nie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 28% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Comoros | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Poland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 18 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 54% |
| Scientists | 13 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 7 | 17% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,452,131
of 25,827,956 outputs
Outputs from Poetics
#35
of 553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,316
of 439,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Poetics
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,827,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 553 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.