↓ Skip to main content

A Study of Fluorinated β-Nitrostyrenes as Antimicrobial Agents

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Sciences, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
A Study of Fluorinated β-Nitrostyrenes as Antimicrobial Agents
Published in
Applied Sciences, February 2012
DOI 10.3390/app2010114
Authors

King Lo, Hugh Cornell, Gina Nicoletti, Neale Jackson, Helmut Hügel

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Chemistry 1 33%
Engineering 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#3,575,774
of 12,369,000 outputs
Outputs from Applied Sciences
#96
of 1,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,599
of 263,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Sciences
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,369,000 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,458 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.