↓ Skip to main content

Comparisons of Halogenated β-Nitrostyrenes as Antimicrobial Agents

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Sciences, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Comparisons of Halogenated β-Nitrostyrenes as Antimicrobial Agents
Published in
Applied Sciences, August 2014
DOI 10.3390/app4030380
Authors

Hugh Cornell, Thu Nguyen, Gina Nicoletti, Neale Jackson, Helmut Hügel

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 50%
Engineering 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2019.
All research outputs
#4,559,803
of 14,792,218 outputs
Outputs from Applied Sciences
#252
of 2,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,590
of 262,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Sciences
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,792,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,290 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.