You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementation strategies of internet-based asthma self-management support in usual care. Study protocol for the IMPASSE cluster randomized trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-113 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Johanna L. van Gaalen, Moira J. Bakker, Leti van Bodegom-Vos, Jiska B. Snoeck-Stroband, Willem J. J. Assendelft, Ad A. Kaptein, Victor van der Meer, Christian Taube, Bart P. Thoonen, Jacob K. Sont, for the IMPASSE study group |
| Abstract |
Internet-based self-management (IBSM) support cost-effectively improves asthma control, asthma related quality of life, number of symptom-free days, and lung function in patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma. The current challenge is to implement IBSM in clinical practice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 15% |
| Researcher | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 11% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 40 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 12% |
| Psychology | 16 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 15% |
| Unknown | 51 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2013.
All research outputs
#6,755,380
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,143
of 1,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,343
of 275,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#20
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.