You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Unintended consequences: quantifying the benefits, iatrogenic harms and downstream cascade costs of musculoskeletal MRI in UK primary care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open Quality, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001287 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Imran Mohammed Sajid, Anand Parkunan, Kathleen Frost |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 333 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 67 | 20% |
| Spain | 35 | 11% |
| United States | 29 | 9% |
| Australia | 10 | 3% |
| Canada | 9 | 3% |
| France | 6 | 2% |
| Ireland | 5 | 2% |
| Mexico | 4 | 1% |
| Finland | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 43 | 13% |
| Unknown | 121 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 251 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 41 | 12% |
| Scientists | 40 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 30 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 36 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 245. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2023.
All research outputs
#154,005
of 25,621,213 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open Quality
#3
of 1,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,513
of 454,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open Quality
#2
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,621,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.