↓ Skip to main content

Unintended consequences: quantifying the benefits, iatrogenic harms and downstream cascade costs of musculoskeletal MRI in UK primary care

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open Quality, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 761)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
336 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unintended consequences: quantifying the benefits, iatrogenic harms and downstream cascade costs of musculoskeletal MRI in UK primary care
Published in
BMJ Open Quality, July 2021
DOI 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001287
Pubmed ID
Authors

Imran Mohammed Sajid, Anand Parkunan, Kathleen Frost

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 336 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Master 7 14%
Other 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 18 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 22 45%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 248. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2023.
All research outputs
#129,941
of 23,410,748 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open Quality
#2
of 761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,855
of 441,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open Quality
#1
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,410,748 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.