↓ Skip to main content

The Association between the Establishment of a General Internal Medicine Department and an Increased Number of Blood Cultures in other Departments: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Internal Medicine, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Association between the Establishment of a General Internal Medicine Department and an Increased Number of Blood Cultures in other Departments: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis
Published in
Internal Medicine, January 2021
DOI 10.2169/internalmedicine.6795-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tatsuya Aoki, Hajime Yamazaki, Tadayuki Hashimoto, Ryosuke Horitani, Shunichi Fukuhara

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2021.
All research outputs
#9,893,909
of 18,523,374 outputs
Outputs from Internal Medicine
#613
of 2,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,443
of 280,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Internal Medicine
#5
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,523,374 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.