↓ Skip to main content

The Association between the Establishment of a General Internal Medicine Department and an Increased Number of Blood Cultures in other Departments: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Internal Medicine, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Association between the Establishment of a General Internal Medicine Department and an Increased Number of Blood Cultures in other Departments: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis
Published in
Internal Medicine, January 2021
DOI 10.2169/internalmedicine.6795-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tatsuya Aoki, Hajime Yamazaki, Tadayuki Hashimoto, Ryosuke Horitani, Shunichi Fukuhara

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2021.
All research outputs
#10,211,688
of 19,012,843 outputs
Outputs from Internal Medicine
#635
of 2,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,917
of 334,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Internal Medicine
#7
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,012,843 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,181 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.