↓ Skip to main content

Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic for malaria in Extra-Amazon Region, Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic for malaria in Extra-Amazon Region, Brazil
Published in
Malaria Journal, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-11-390
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Regina F de Oliveira, Silvana P Giozza, Henry M Peixoto, Gustavo AS Romero

Abstract

Rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) for malaria have been demonstrated to be effective and they should replace microscopy in certain areas.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 54 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Master 10 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 13 23%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 9 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2012.
All research outputs
#19,854,550
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#5,309
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,996
of 285,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#70
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.