↓ Skip to main content

TEORIAS POLÍTICAS TRADICIONAIS E TEORIA CRÍTICA

Overview of attention for article published in Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 229)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
TEORIAS POLÍTICAS TRADICIONAIS E TEORIA CRÍTICA
Published in
Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política, December 2017
DOI 10.1590/0102-057091/102
Authors

Alessandro Pinzani

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 31%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 31%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 46%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Philosophy 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,128,229
of 18,873,384 outputs
Outputs from Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política
#34
of 229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,745
of 332,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,873,384 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 229 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them