↓ Skip to main content

Novas ocorrências, novo sinônimo e uma lectotipificação em Loranthaceae

Overview of attention for article published in Rodriguésia, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novas ocorrências, novo sinônimo e uma lectotipificação em Loranthaceae
Published in
Rodriguésia, March 2015
DOI 10.1590/2175-7860201566111
Authors

Claudenir Simões Caires

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2016.
All research outputs
#5,916,313
of 18,141,016 outputs
Outputs from Rodriguésia
#13
of 83 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,508
of 176,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rodriguésia
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,141,016 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them