↓ Skip to main content

Uso do Sistema FM em implante coclear

Overview of attention for article published in CoDAS, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 318)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

1 Wikipedia page


11 Dimensions

Readers on

28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Uso do Sistema FM em implante coclear
Published in
CoDAS, January 2017
DOI 10.1590/2317-1782/20172016053
Pubmed ID

Joice de Moura Silva, Luzia Maria Pozzobom Ventura Pizarro, Liège Franzini Tanamati

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 14%
Other 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 8 29%
Unknown 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 21%
Psychology 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2021.
All research outputs
of 18,912,409 outputs
Outputs from CoDAS
of 318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 332,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CoDAS
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 318 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them