↓ Skip to main content

Oral treatments for fungal infections of the skin of the foot

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oral treatments for fungal infections of the skin of the foot
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003584.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sally EM Bell-Syer, Sameena M Khan, David J Torgerson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 27%
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Psychology 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 17 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2018.
All research outputs
#3,101,742
of 12,826,501 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,849
of 10,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,956
of 250,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#313
of 516 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,826,501 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 516 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.