↓ Skip to main content

Perimortem fractures in Lucy suggest mortality from fall out of tall tree

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
183 news outlets
blogs
26 blogs
twitter
390 tweeters
facebook
29 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
10 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
3 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
Title
Perimortem fractures in Lucy suggest mortality from fall out of tall tree
Published in
Nature, August 2016
DOI 10.1038/nature19332
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Kappelman, Richard A. Ketcham, Stephen Pearce, Lawrence Todd, Wiley Akins, Matthew W. Colbert, Mulugeta Feseha, Jessica A. Maisano, Adrienne Witzel

Abstract

The Pliocene fossil 'Lucy' (Australopithecus afarensis) was discovered in the Afar region of Ethiopia in 1974 and is among the oldest and most complete fossil hominin skeletons discovered. Here we propose, on the basis of close study of her skeleton, that her cause of death was a vertical deceleration event or impact following a fall from considerable height that produced compressive and hinge (greenstick) fractures in multiple skeletal elements. Impacts that are so severe as to cause concomitant fractures usually also damage internal organs; together, these injuries are hypothesized to have caused her death. Lucy has been at the centre of a vigorous debate about the role, if any, of arboreal locomotion in early human evolution. It is therefore ironic that her death can be attributed to injuries resulting from a fall, probably out of a tall tree, thus offering unusual evidence for the presence of arborealism in this species.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 390 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 174 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 39 22%
Researcher 31 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Student > Master 19 11%
Professor 14 8%
Other 34 19%
Unknown 17 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 23%
Social Sciences 26 14%
Arts and Humanities 23 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 7%
Environmental Science 9 5%
Other 39 22%
Unknown 28 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1866. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,695
of 17,968,541 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#350
of 80,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35
of 271,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#8
of 993 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,968,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80,782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 91.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 993 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.