↓ Skip to main content

Instrumentos para a avaliação dos transtornos alimentares

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, December 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Instrumentos para a avaliação dos transtornos alimentares
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, December 2002
DOI 10.1590/s1516-44462002000700008
Authors

Silvia Freitas, Clarice Gorenstein, Jose C Appolinario

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 29%
Student > Master 2 29%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,024,258
of 18,571,001 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#112
of 427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,439
of 282,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,571,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them