↓ Skip to main content

Mortality and guideline-concordant care for older patients with schizophrenia: a retrospective longitudinal study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mortality and guideline-concordant care for older patients with schizophrenia: a retrospective longitudinal study
Published in
BMC Medicine, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-10-147
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jack Y Tsan, Eileen M Stock, Jazmin M Gonzalez, David S Greenawalt, John E Zeber, Emran Rouf, Laurel A Copeland

Abstract

Schizophrenia is associated with excess mortality and multimorbidity, which is possibly associated with difficulty in coordinating care for multiple mental and physical comorbidities. We analyzed the receipt by patients with schizophrenia of 11 types of guideline-concordant care and the association of such care with survival.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 122 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 25 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 24%
Psychology 21 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 13%
Social Sciences 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 28 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2012.
All research outputs
#16,775,710
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#3,471
of 4,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,634
of 287,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#55
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.