↓ Skip to main content

Global resorption efficiencies of trace elements in leaves of terrestrial plants

Overview of attention for article published in Functional Ecology, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global resorption efficiencies of trace elements in leaves of terrestrial plants
Published in
Functional Ecology, May 2021
DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.13809
Authors

Hao Chen, Sasha C. Reed, Xiaotao Lü, Kongcao Xiao, Kelin Wang, Dejun Li

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 31%
Environmental Science 2 15%
Mathematics 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2021.
All research outputs
#15,975,149
of 19,891,915 outputs
Outputs from Functional Ecology
#2,050
of 2,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,781
of 336,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Functional Ecology
#33
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,891,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.