You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of Trial Complexity on Decision Making
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Psychology, December 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.757 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Irwin A. Horowitz, Lynne ForsterLee, Ian Brolly |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 24% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 21% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 13 | 34% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Psychology
#2,358
of 3,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,385
of 92,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Psychology
#31
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.