↓ Skip to main content

Long-term survival and healthcare utilization outcomes attributable to sepsis and pneumonia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-term survival and healthcare utilization outcomes attributable to sepsis and pneumonia
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-432
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Dick, Hangsheng Liu, Jack Zwanziger, Eli Perencevich, E Yoko Furuya, Elaine Larson, Monika Pogorzelska-Maziarz, Patricia W Stone

Abstract

Hospital associated infections are major problems, which are increasing in incidence and very costly. However, most research has focused only on measuring consequences associated with the initial hospitalization. We explored the long-term consequences of infections in elderly Medicare patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) and discharged alive, focusing on: sepsis, pneumonia, central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP); the relationships between the infections and long-term survival and resource utilization; and how resource utilization was related to impending death during the follow up period.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 93 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Other 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 27 28%
Unknown 22 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 23%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 22 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2018.
All research outputs
#12,672,030
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,147
of 7,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,949
of 276,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#63
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.