You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Motivating medical information system performance by system quality, service quality, and job satisfaction for evidence-based practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-12-135 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ching-Sheng Chang, Su-Yueh Chen, Yi-Ting Lan |
| Abstract |
No previous studies have addressed the integrated relationships among system quality, service quality, job satisfaction, and system performance; this study attempts to bridge such a gap with evidence-based practice study. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| India | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 154 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 13% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 38 | 24% |
| Unknown | 39 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 31 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 16 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Unknown | 44 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2013.
All research outputs
#15,256,901
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1,305
of 1,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,203
of 275,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#31
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,979 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.