↓ Skip to main content

An intravascular immune response to Borrelia burgdorferi involves Kupffer cells and iNKT cells

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Immunology, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
180 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
An intravascular immune response to Borrelia burgdorferi involves Kupffer cells and iNKT cells
Published in
Nature Immunology, March 2010
DOI 10.1038/ni.1855
Pubmed ID
Authors

Woo-Yong Lee, Tara J Moriarty, Connie H Y Wong, Hong Zhou, Robert M Strieter, Nico van Rooijen, George Chaconas, Paul Kubes, Lee WY, Moriarty TJ, Wong CH, Zhou H, Strieter RM, van Rooijen N, Chaconas G, Kubes P

Abstract

Here we investigate the dynamics of the hepatic intravascular immune response to a pathogen relevant to invariant natural killer T cells (iNKT cells). Immobilized Kupffer cells with highly ramified extended processes into multiple sinusoids could effectively capture blood-borne, disseminating Borrelia burgdorferi, creating a highly efficient surveillance and filtering system. After ingesting B. burgdorferi, Kupffer cells induced chemokine receptor CXCR3-dependent clustering of iNKT cells. Kupffer cells and iNKT cells formed stable contacts via the antigen-presenting molecule CD1d, which led to iNKT cell activation. An absence of iNKT cells caused B. burgdorferi to leave the blood and enter the joints more effectively. B. burgdorferi that escaped Kupffer cells entered the liver parenchyma and survived despite Ito cell responses. Kupffer cell-iNKT cell interactions induced a key intravascular immune response that diminished the dissemination of B. burgdorferi.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 9%
Netherlands 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
Italy 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
France 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 81 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 31%
Researcher 26 26%
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 17 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 47%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Unspecified 3 3%
Other 5 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2018.
All research outputs
#954,717
of 12,226,048 outputs
Outputs from Nature Immunology
#482
of 2,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#927,810
of 11,574,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Immunology
#479
of 2,726 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,226,048 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,574,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,726 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.