↓ Skip to main content

Developing a Dementia Research Registry: a descriptive case study from North Thames DeNDRoN and the EVIDEM programme

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing a Dementia Research Registry: a descriptive case study from North Thames DeNDRoN and the EVIDEM programme
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-11-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steve Iliffe, Lisa Curry, Kalpa Kharicha, Greta Rait, Jane Wilcock, David Lowery, Archana Tapuria, Dipak Kalra, Craig Ritchie

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Indonesia 1 1%
Unknown 97 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 26%
Researcher 18 18%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Professor 4 4%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 13%
Social Sciences 12 12%
Psychology 12 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 7%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 16 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,486,475
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,092
of 2,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,635
of 183,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.