↓ Skip to main content

ZBTB33 is mutated in clonal hematopoiesis and myelodysplastic syndromes and impacts RNA splicing

Overview of attention for article published in Blood Cancer Discovery, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ZBTB33 is mutated in clonal hematopoiesis and myelodysplastic syndromes and impacts RNA splicing
Published in
Blood Cancer Discovery, July 2021
DOI 10.1158/2643-3230.bcd-20-0224
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ellen M Beauchamp, Matthew Leventhal, Elsa Bernard, Emma R Hoppe, Gabriele Todisco, Maria Creignou, Anna Gallì, Cecilia A Castellano, Marie McConkey, Akansha Tarun, Waihay Wong, Monica Schenone, Caroline Stanclift, Benjamin Tanenbaum, Edyta Malolepsza, Björn Nilsson, Alexander G Bick, Joshua S Weinstock, Mendy Miller, Abhishek Niroula, Andrew Dunford, Amaro Taylor-Weiner, Timothy Wood, Alex Barbera, Shankara Anand, Bruce M Psaty, Pinkal Desai, Michael H Cho, Andrew D Johnson, Ruth Loos, Daniel G MacArthur, Monkol Lek, Donna S Neuberg, Kasper Lage, Steven A Carr, Eva Hellstrom-Lindberg, Luca Malcovati, Elli Papaemmanuil, Chip Stewart, Gad Getz, Robert K Bradley, Siddhartha Jaiswal, Benjamin L Ebert

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 27%
Unspecified 4 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 8 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2024.
All research outputs
#3,765,408
of 26,549,961 outputs
Outputs from Blood Cancer Discovery
#115
of 223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,418
of 451,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood Cancer Discovery
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,549,961 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.