↓ Skip to main content

Hormonal and intrauterine methods for contraception for women aged 25 years and younger.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hormonal and intrauterine methods for contraception for women aged 25 years and younger.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009805.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tang JH, Lopez LM, Mody S, Grimes DA

Abstract

Women between the ages of 15 and 24 years have high rates of unintended pregnancy; over half of women in this age group want to avoid pregnancy. However, women under age 25 years have been found to have higher typical contraceptive failure rates within the first 12 months of use than older women. High discontinuation rates may also be a problem in this population. Concern that adolescents and young women will not find hormonal or intrauterine contraceptives acceptable or effective might deter healthcare providers from recommending these contraceptive methods. 

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Croatia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 47 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Postgraduate 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 60%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 6 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2012.
All research outputs
#2,018,781
of 3,626,769 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,915
of 6,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,510
of 275,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#429
of 523 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,626,769 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 523 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.